BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS

Friday, March 28, 2008

Let's Reject the Sham Constitution Decisively

ျပတ္ျပတ္သားသား ကန္႔ကြက္မွဖစ္ပါလိမ့္မယ္


မိတ္ေဆြမ်ား၊
ရဲေဘာ္မ်ားခင္ဗ်ား

မၾကာခင္က်င္းပေတာ့မယ့္ နအဖရဲ႔ လူထုဆႏၵခံယူပြဲနဲ႔ပတ္သက္ၿပီးမန္မာ့ဒီမိုကေရစီအင္အားစုမ်ားအတြင္း၊ပည္တြင္းမွာေရာပည္ပ မွာပါ သေဘာထား ရပ္ ကြဲျပားေနတာတြ႔ရပါတယ္။ တစုက ဒီဆႏၵခံယူပြဲကို လံုးလံုးလ်ားလ်ား သပိတ္ေမွာက္ေရးျဖစ္ၿပီး လူထုကို ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲမွာ သြားေရာက္မဲမေပးၾကဖို႔ လႈံ႔ေဆာ္ေနၾကပါတယ္။နာက္တစုကေတာ့ ဒီဆႏၵခံယူပြဲမွာ လူထုရဲ႔အသဲၾကားက မဲတျပားကို အက်ိဳးရွိရွိ အသံုးခ်ဖို႔ျဖစ္ၿပီး လူထုကို ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲမွာ သြားေရာက္ၿပီး ကန္႔ကြက္မဲေပးၾကဖို႔ လႈံ႔ေဆာတိုက္တြန္းေနၾကပါတယ္။ အားလံုးရဲ႔ တူညီမႈကေတာ့ နအဖက တဖက္သတ္ေရးဆြဲထားတ့ဲ စစ္အာဏာရွင္စနစ္ကို တရားဝင္အသက္သြင္းၿပီးမန္မာျပည္သူေတြကို ရာသက္ ပန္ စစ္ကြၽန္ဇာတ္သြင္းမ့ဲ အေျခခံဥပေဒအတုအေယာင္ကို ကန္႔ကြက္ၾကျခင္းပါပဲ။

အခု ကြၽန္ေတာ္တို႔ နအဖရဲ႔ အေျခခံဥပေဒမူၾကမ္းကိုလ့လာခြင့္ရပါၿပီ။ သူတို႔ရွ႔က ႀကိမ္ဖန္မ်ားစြာ ေျပာထားသလိုပါပဲ၊ က်ေနာ္တို႔ အားလံုးမွ်ာ္လင့္ထားသလိုပါပဲ၊ ဒီအေျခခံဥပေဒမူၾကမ္းဟာ ၁၄ ႏွစ္ေက်ာ္ၾကာ လက္ေရြးစင္ခါင္းေခါက္ေရြးခ်ယ္ထားတ့ဲ လက္ပါးေစ မ်ားနဲ႔ က်င္းပတ့ဲ အမ်ိဳးသားညီလာခံက ခ်မွတ္ထားတ့ဲ အေျခခံမူမ်ား၊ အေသးစတ္မူမ်ားနဲ႔ ထပ္တူထပ္မွ်ပါပဲ။ ဒီအေျခခံမူေတြကိုပဲ ပုဒ္မနံပါတ္ တပ္လိုက္တာပါ။

ဒီအေျခခံဥပေဒဟာ စစ္အာဏာရွင္စနစ္ကို တရားဝင္ျပဳဖို႔၊ ကာကြယ္ေရးဦးစီးခ်ဳပ္ကို အျမင့္ဆံုးအာဏာေတြပးဖို႔နဲ႔ စစ္တပ္ဆိုတာကို တိုင္းျပည္ရဲ႔ အခြင့္ထူးခံလူတန္းစားအျဖစ္ ဖန္တီးၿပီးပည္သူလူထုကို ေက်းကြၽန္မ်ားအျဖစ္ အသက္သြင္းဖို႔ရးဆြဲထားတယ္ဆိုတာ အထူးေျပာဖို႔ မလိုေတာ့ပါဘူး။ ၿပီးေတာ့ ဒီအေျခခံဥပေဒဟာ တိုင္းျပည္ရဲ႔ လက္ရွိ ႏိုင္ငံေရး၊ စီးပြားေရး၊ လူမႈေရး၊ လူမ်ိဳးစုေရးျပႆနာေတြ ကိုလည္း မေျဖရွင္းႏိုင္တ့ဲအျပင္ ပိုၿပီးဆိုးဝါးေစလိမ့္မယ္ဆိုတာကိုလည္း အထူးေျပာဖို႔ မလိုေတာ့ပါ။ ဒါေပမယ့္ ဒီဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုအေျခခံဥပေဒ မူၾကမ္းမွာ နအဖကထပ္ၿပီး ဖနတီးထားတ့ဲကာက္က်စ္စဥ္းလဲမႈ၊ လွည့္ဖ်ားမႈတခုကိုေတာ့ အေရးတႀကီးထာက္ျပခ်င္ပါတယ္။

အမ်ိဳးသားညီလာခံက ခ်မွတ္တ့ဲ အေျခခံမူမ်ားထဲမွာ အခန္း (၁၄) အသြင္ကူးေျပာင္းေရးကာလပ႒ာန္းခ်က္မ်ာပုဒ္မ()မွာ ဒီလိုဆိုထား ပါတယ္။

ဤဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုအေျခခံဥပေဒသည္ပည္လံုးကြၽတ္ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲတြင္ ဆႏၵမဲေပးပိုင္ခြင့္ရွိသူအားလံုး၏ ထက္ဝက္ေက်ာ္ထာက္ခံဆႏၵမဲျဖင့္ အတည္ျပဳပ႒ာန္းၿပီးသည့္ေန႔မွစ၍ ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္တဝွမ္းလံုး၌ အာဏာတည္သည္

ဒီျပ႒ာန္းခ်က္အရဆိုရင္မန္မာႏိုင္ငံလူဦး ၅၄သန္းမွာ မဲေပးပိုင္ခြင့္ရွိသူ ၃၂ သန္းေက်ာ္ ရွိတယ္လို႔ ခန္႔မွန္းထားတ့ဲအတြက္၊ နအဖ အေနနဲ႔ ဒီဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုကို အတည္ျပဳႏိုင္ဖို႔အတြက္ အနည္းဆံုး ၁၆ သန္းေက်ာ္ထာက္ခံမဲရဖို႔ လိုပါတယ္။

ဒါေပမယ့္ ယခု ကြၽန္ေတာ္တို႔တြ႔ျမင္ေနရတ့ဲ ဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုအေျခခံဥပေဒမူၾကမ္းရဲ႔ အခန္း (၁၄) ကူးေျပာင္းေရးကာလပ႒ာန္းခ်က္မ်ား ပုဒ္မ(၄၄၁)မွာေတာ့ ဒီလိုေျပာင္းလဲသြားပါေတာ့တယ္။

ပည္လံုးကြၽတ္ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲတြင္ ဆႏၵမဲေပးပိုင္ခြင့္ရွိသူအားလံုး၏ ထက္ဝက္ေက်ာ္ မဲေပးသည့္ဆႏၵမဲ၏ မဲအမ်ားျဖင့္ အတည္ျပဳျပ႒ာန္းလိုက္ သည့္ ဤဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုအေျခခံဥပေဒသည္ပည္ေထာင္စုလႊတ္ေတာ္ ပထမအႀကိမ္ အစည္းအေဝး စတင္က်င္းပသည့္ေန႔မွစ၍ ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ တဝွမ္းလံုး၌ အာဏာတည္သည္

ဒီျပ႒ာန္းခ်က္အရဆိုရင္ နအဖဟာ သူ႔ရဲ႔ဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုကို အတည္ျပဳဖို႔အတြက္ စုစုေပါင္း မဲေပးပိုင္ခြင့္ရွိသူမ်ားထဲမွ ၅ဝ% ေက်ာ္က မဲေပးၿပီး၊ အဲဒီထဲက မဲအမ်ားစုကိုပဲ ရဖို႔လိုပါတယ္။ မဲေပးခြင့္ရွိသူဦးေရ ၃၂ သန္း ရွိတယ္လို႔ ခန္႔မွန္းထားတာမို႔ ၁၆ သန္းေက်ာ္က မဲ±ံုကိုလာၿပီး မဲပးရင္ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲ အထေျမာက္တယ္၊ အဲဒီထဲကမွ သန္းေက်ာ္ကထာက္ခံမဲေပးရင္ သူ႔ရဲ႔ဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုကို အတည္ျပဳတယ္လို႔ ဆိုပါ တယ္။ ဒါဟာျဖင့္ နအဖအေနနဲ႔ သူကိုယ္တိုင္ ၁၄ ႏွစ္ေက်ာ္ရးဆြဲလာခ့ဲတ့ဲ အေျခခံမူကိုဖါက္ဖ်က္လိုက္တာပါပဲ။ ဒါဟာျဖင့္ နအဖဟာ အမ်ိဳးသားညီလာခံကို မလြဲမေရွာင္သာ တက္ေရာက္ခ့ဲရတ့ဲ တိုင္းရင္းသားအပစ္ရပ္အဖြဲ႔မ်ားကို အႀကီးအက်ယ္စာ္ကားလိုက္တာပါပဲ။ ဒါဟာျဖင့္ နအဖဟာ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲမွာပည္သူလူထုရဲ႔ ကန္႔ကြက္မႈကို ဘယ္ေလာက္ေတာင္ၾကာက္ရြံနတယ္ ဆိုတာကို ထုတ္ေဖၚျပသ လိုက္တာပါပဲ။

က်ေနာ္တို႔ သတိထားရမယ့္ အခ်က္ကေလးေတြ ထပ္ရွင္းျပခ်င္ပါတယ္။ ၁၉၈၈ ခုႏွစ္ေနာက္ပိုင္း ဗမာျပည္ကြန္ျမဴနစ္ပါတီ ၿပိဳကြဲၿပီးတ့ဲနာက္ ±တ္နဲ႔ နအဖစစ္အုပ္စု ဆက္ဆံေရးေျပလည္မႈေၾကာင့္ ယူနန္ျပည္နယ္ကေန ±တ္ေတြမန္မာႏိုင္ငံတြင္းကို အလံုးအရင္းနဲ႔ ဝင္ေရာက္လာခ့ဲၾကတာ အခုဆို သန္းေက်ာ္ သန္းေလာက္ ရွိေနပါၿပီ။ စစ္အစိုးရက အထူးအခြင့္အေရးေတြပးထားလို႔ စီးပြားဖစ္ခ်မ္းသာေနၾကတ့ဲ ဒီတ±တ္ေတြဟာ မႏၱေလး၊ လား±ႈး၊က်ာက္မဲ စတ့ဲ မႏၱေလးတိုင္း၊ ရွမ္းျပည္နယ္၊ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ေဒသေတြမွာ စုေဝးေနထိုင္ၾကၿပီး ႏိုင္ငံသားကဒ္(သို႔) ဧည့္ႏိုင္ငံသားကဒ္ေတြ ကိုင္ထားၾကပါတယ္။ အခု နအဖရဲ႔ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲဆိုင္ရာ ဥပေဒမွာလည္း ထူးထူးျခားျခား ဧည့္ႏိုင္ငံသားေတြ၊ ယာယီသက္ေသခံလက္မွတ္ကိုင္ေဆာင္သူေတြကို မဲေပးခြင့္ျပဳထားပါတယ္။ ဒီတ±တ္ေတြက နအဖ အလိုက် ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲမွာထာက္ခံမဲေပးၾကမွာ အေသအခ်ာပါပဲ။ အဲဒီလိုပဲ နအဖအလိုက်ထာက္ခံမဲပးၾကမယ့္ လက္နက္ခ်တိုင္းရင္း သားအဖြဲ႔ေတြ၊ ကိုးကန္႔နဲ႔ ဘိန္းဘုရင္ေတြ၊ ႀကံဖြံ႔ေတြ၊ စစ္တပ္မိသားစုေတြပါင္းလိုက္ရင္ နအဖဟာ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲကိုအာင္ျမင္စြာ က်င္းပႏိုင္မွာျဖစ္သလို လိုအပ္တ့ဲထာက္ခံမဲ သန္းေက်ာ္ကိုလည္း အလယ္တကူ ရႏိုင္မွာပါ။

ဒီေတာ့ က်ေနာ္တို႔အတြက္ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲကို သပိတ္ေမွာက္ျခင္းဟာရြးခ်ယ္စရာ နည္းလမ္းမဟုတ္ပါ။ က်ေနာ္တို႔လူေတြ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲကို မသြားေလ၊ နအဖက ႀကိဳက္ေလဖစ္ပါလိမ့္မယ္။ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲကိုသြားၿပီး ကန္႔ကြက္မဲေပးျခင္းနဲ႔ နအဖရဲ႔ မသမာမႈေတြကိုဖၚထုတ္ျခင္း ကသာ နအဖရဲ႔ စစ္အာဏာရွင္စနစတရားဝင္ျပဳေရးစီမံခ်က္ကို အေကာင္းဆံုး တိုက္ဖ်က္ႏိုင္မွာပါ။

နအဖကေတာ့ကာက္က်စ္တ့ဲနည္းလမ္းမ်ားနဲ႔ အႏိုင္ရဖို႔ ႀကိဳးစားမွာပါ။ ဒါေပမယ့္လည္း မဲေပးတ့ဲသူမ်ားေလေလ၊ ကန္႔ကြက္မဲေပးသူမ်ားလေလ သူ႔အတြက္ လိမ္ဖို႔ခက္ေလဖစ္ပါလိမ့္မယ္။ ၿပီးေတာ့ မဲ±ံုအားလံုးမွာ က်ေနာ္တို႔ရဲ႔ျပည္သူေတြ၊ သံဃာေတြကစာင့္ၾကပ္ၾကည့္±နၾကမယ္ဆိုရင္ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲရဲ႔ မသမာမႈေတြကိုလည္းဖၚထုတ္ႏိုင္မွာပါ။နာက္ဆံုး နအဖက သူ႔ရဲ႔ဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုကို အတင္းအဓမၼ အတည္ျပဳ လိုက္ရင္ေတာင္မွ ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲဟာ မတရားလို႔၊ မမွ်တလို႔၊ ဒီဥပေဒကို အသိအမွတ္ မျပဳၾကဖို႔ ဆက္ၿပီးတိုက္ပြဲဝင္ႏိုင္မွာပါ။

တခ်ိဳ႔လည္း ေျပာၾကပါတယ္။ လူထုက ကန္႔ကြက္လို႔ ဒီဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုကို နအဖက အတည္မျပဳႏိုင္ရင္လည္း တစ္ကပန္စလိမ့္မယ္။ အစကပန္ၿပီးေရးဆြဲရင္နာက္ထပ္ ၁၄ ႏွစ္ၾကာအုန္းမယ္။ ဒါေၾကာင့္ ဒီဥပေဒကိုပဲ လက္ခံအတည္ျပဳလိုက္ၾကပါစို႔လို႔ စည္း±ံုးလႈံ႔ေဆာ္နတာလည္း ရွိပါေသးတယ္။ လံုးဝမွားပါတယ္။ ဒီဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုကို လူထုက ကန္႔ကြက္တာဟာ () နအဖက တဖက္သတ္ေရးဆြဲထားတာဖစ္လို႔ () လူထုကရြးေကာက္ထားတ့ဲ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ားရဲ႔ ပါဝင္မႈ မရွိလို႔ () တိုင္းျပည္ရဲ႔ ႏိုင္ငံေရး၊ စီးပြားေရး၊ လူမႈေရး၊ လူမ်ိဳး စုေရးျပႆနာေတြကို ေျဖရွင္ႏိုင္စြမ္း မရွိလို႔ပါ။ ၿပီးတာ့ လူထုက ဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုတခုတည္းကိုသာ ကန္႔ကြက္တာ မဟုတ္ပါဘူး။ နအဖရဲ႔ စစ္အုပ္စိုးမႈတခုလံုးကိုပါ ကန္႔ကြက္တာပါ။ ဒါေၾကာင့္ နအဖက အဆင့္()ကပန္စလိမ့္မယ္လို႔ ယံုၾကည္တာ မွားပါတယ္။ပန္စရင္တာင္မွ အဲဒီလိုပန္စမႈဟာ ၁၉၉ဝရြးေကာက္ပြဲအႏိုင္ရပါတီနဲ႔ လႊတ္ေတာ္ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား တိုင္းရင္းသားကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ားနဲ႔ဆြးေႏြးညိႏိႈင္းၿပီးမွပန္စတာမ်ိဳးပဲဖစ္ပါလိမ့္မယ္။ တဖက္သတ္ေရးဆြဲထားတ့ဲ ဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုကို လူထုကပတ္ျပတ္သားသားငင္းပယ္ၿပီးတ့ဲနာက္ နအဖကို တဖက္သတ္လုပ္ငန္းစဥ္ေတြပန္စဖို႔ ထုကေရာ တိုင္းရင္းသားအဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ားကေရာ ႏိုင္ငတကာမိသားစုႀကီးကပါ ခြင့္ျပဳမွာ မဟုတ္ပါဘူး။

နိဂံုးခ်ဳပ္အေနနဲ႔ ထပ္ၿပီးေမတၱာရပ္ခံခ်င္ပါတယ္။

ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲကို သပိတ္ေမွာက္ေရးဟာရြးခ်ယ္စရာနည္းလမ္း မဟုတ္ေတာ့ဘူး။

က်ေနာ္တို႔အားလံုး တညီတညာတည္း၊ တသံတည္းနဲ႔ လူထုကို၊ ဝန္ထမ္းေတြ၊ တပ္မေတာ္သားေတြ၊ တိုင္းရင္းသားေတြ၊ ႀကံဖြံ႔ေတြ၊ အားလံုးေသာလူထုကို ဆႏၵခံယူပြဲမွာ မဲ±ံုကိုသြားၿပီး ကန္႔ကြက္မဲေတြေပးၾကဖို႔၊ပတ္ျပတ္သားသား လံႈ႔ေဆာ္ၾကပါစို႔

လးစားစြာ

အာင္ဒင္
မတ္လ
၂၈၊ ၂ဝဝ၈

Monday, March 24, 2008

Moderator Speech at U.S Burma Conference

US Burma Conference, March 24-25, 2008

Organized by Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization (CRS) and Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), U.S. Department of State


Introduction and general overview of ethnic groups in Burma
Aung Din, Executive Director, U.S. Campaign for Burma


Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen,


I am here to moderate the panel of ethnic groups in Burma, which is a very important issue to understand the problems facing our country. You may be aware that the struggle of the people of Burma today is not only for democratization, but also for national reconciliation. As we are confronting the brutal military junta to reclaim democracy and fundamental human rights, we are also working to regain the trust and unity among all ethnic nationalities, without whom the Union of Burma will not be realized. Let me begin with a general overview before three experts speak on their particular concerns.


Burma has eight major ethnic nationalities, which are the Burman, Shan, Kachin, Karen, Karenni, Mon, Rakhine (aka) Arakan, and Chin. The Burman majority is estimated about 60% and the rest combined are about 40% of the total population. The majority Burman occupies about 40% of total area and the rest combined occupy about 60%. There are also many other ethnic groups, who are actually sub-groups related one way or another to the major races. And these major ethnic groups were independent Kingdoms or city-states in the past, with their own territories and their own cultures and languages.


For a thousand years, until the fall of Bago in 1757, the Mon ruled much of lower Burma. The Rakhine (aka) Arakan have a long history of independence, and they had ruled their owned-kingdom until 1784. When the British colonized Burma with three wars in 1824, 1852 and 1886, Arakan, Mon and Karen areas, which were occupied territories of Burma, were also colonized together and later known as “Ministerial Burma” or “Burma Proper”, which was under “direct rule” of the British. Karenni State, Shan State, Chin State and Kachin State were recognized then as sovereign states as they were not conquered by the Burman King. British conquered or pacified these areas during a different period of time and formed them together as the “Frontier Areas”, under its indirect rule. Under the British policy of “indirect rule”, local chiefs of the Chin, Kachin, Karenni and the Shan were allowed to retain a certain level of administrative and judiciary power within their respective territories.



The Aung San-Attlee Agreement, signed by our national leader U Aung San and then British Prime Minister Attlee in 1947, called for the “unification of the Frontier Areas and Ministerial Burma with the free consent of those areas”[1]. U Aung San and ethnic leaders met in Panglong in Shan State, discussed frankly and patiently and finally agreed to achieve the independence together. The second paragraph of the Panglong Agreement stated that “The members of the Conference, believing that freedom will be more speedily achieved by the Shans, the Kachins and the Chins by their immediate co-operation with the Interim Burmese Government:-[2]”. The Panglong Agreement, signed by U Aung San and leaders of the Shan, Kachin and Chin people on February 12, 1947 was the foundation to achieve the independence from the British together, and the frame-work to form an independent Union together on the basic of equality among all ethnic nationalities. However, this fundamental principle of equality never came true and it is the reason for Burma being in a civil war, which was born together with independence and has lasted to this day.



Ethnic leaders had expected that the 1947 Constitution would be based on a Federal system, which they agreed in the Panglong Agreement. However, as U Aung San was assassinated in July 1947, what he agreed with the ethnic leaders was not realized and the 1947 Constitution came alive. While Shan State, Kachin State, Karenni State, and Chin Special Division were recognized, the power was totally controlled by the central government, run by the Burman majority. Karenni people felt that they were forced to join in a union without adequate consultation and then took up arms against the central government. The Karen also started its armed rebellion soon and the Mon and Arakan followed later. In 1958, the Shan started their revolution for independence and the Kachin’s independence movement began in 1961. In 1989, The Chin National Front was formed to challenge the military junta by arms struggle.



For some Burmese, they think that they are inheritors of the pre-British Burma Kingdom and therefore they belong to all parts of Burma today. For them, the Burman majority is the ruler and the ethnic groups are their subordinates. This sentiment is deeply rooted among the military leaders. Federalism with volunteer participation based on equality is the major source of the unified Burma for ethnic leaders and national leader U Aung San. However, for the military leaders, federalism is the major source of disintegration of the country, and the major excuse of their coup in 1962 and their successive and continuous ruling of the country to this day. The Burmese military leaders still hold the mindset of ancient Kings, using its military strength to expand and control territories and subordinate others to be their loyal servants. Those who refuse to accept its authority are destroyed or driven out. It is the reason why over 3,200 villages in eastern Burma have been destroyed, with over 500,000 ethnic populations hiding in the jungles and mountains as internally displaced persons and over two millions people living in neighboring countries as unwelcome refugees and illegal immigrants.



However, since 1988, the majority of Burmans have come to realize the suffering of ethnic nationalities under the successive military rulers. Thanks to the All Burma Students Democratic Front (ABSDF), the student army which was formed by students after the bloody crack-down on the 1988 popular uprising, ethnic revolutionary groups came to realize that equality and self-determination can be achieved by working together with the Burmese democracy forces. With the same belief, all ethnic political parties in Burma also support Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and her party, the National League for Democracy (NLD). The Bo Aung Kyaw Street Joint Statement No (1), by the National League for Democracy and the United Nationalities League for Democracy (UNLD) (coalition of all ethnic parties contested in the 1990 elections), was signed by leaders of both the NLD and UNLD on August 29, 1990. As stated in the paragraph no. (4-B) of that statement, the NLD and UNLD “agree to call for a Conference of National Reconciliation with the participation of all ethnic nationalities, under the guidance of the new Parliament, to write a new constitution, which will be sustainable and agreeable among all ethnic races.[3] They also agreed in paragraph no. (4-C) that “all ethnic nationalities should acquire equality in politics and race as well as self-determination fully and that a Union that grants democracy and human rights should be established with the unity of all ethnic nationalities”[4]. However, their dream never comes true again as the military junta has refused to honor the 1990 election results and has continually denied convening the Parliament.



The military junta has claimed that since 1990, it has reached negotiated ceasefire agreements with 17 ethnic armed groups. However, most of these groups, notably Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), New Mon State Party (NMSP), Shan State Army (North), and United Wa State Party (UWSA), are still holding their armies and arms. Three major groups, the Karen National Union (KNU), the Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP) and the Shan State Army (South) are still active in armed conflict with the military junta forces.[5] When entering into the ceasefire agreement with the junta, ethnic groups were told that they would have chance to discuss various political differences. Later, they were invited to attend the national convention, which the election winning party, the NLD and ethnic parties refused to participate in. During the later part of the 14-year long national convention, proposals submitted by these ethnic ceasefire groups, demanding for equality and self-determination, were denied. Recently, the junta has claimed that the state constitution is already written, and planned to call for a nationwide referendum in May this year to approve it.



Apparently, based on the basic and detailed principles adopted by the national convention, this constitution does not grant democracy, human rights and rule of law. Furthermore, it also does not meet the expectation of the ethnic nationalities. While the head of the military, the Commander-in-Chief becomes the most powerful person in Burma unelected, with the power to administer all military affairs freely, power to stage military coup whenever he deems fit, and power to control the Country’s executive, legislative and judiciary branches, ethnic states are created as the subordinates of the mainland. Chiefs of states and their Cabinets are to be appointed by the President and key departments in states, regarding security and border affairs, will be controlled by the military. While military officers, appointed by the Commander-in-Chief, occupy 25% of the seats of the state Parliament, judges appointed by the President will manage the state judiciary affairs. There is no sign of equality and self-administration.


Ethnic resistance will surely continue. The three major armed groups, KNU, KNPP and SSA (South) will continue their arm struggled and some ceasefire groups will resume their revolution, if the junta approves the constitution against the will of the people of Burma and asks them to disarm. The New Mon State Party, one of the largest ceasefire groups with nearly 10,000 strong forces, issued a statement on March 9, 2008, in which it demands that the referendum should not be held before the tripartite dialogue, and that the draft constitution should be amended by discussion with ethnic nationalities and democratic organizations.[6] Meanwhile, Kachin people are putting pressure on the three ceasefire groups in Kachin State, KIO, NDA (K) (New Democratic Army-Kachin) and KDA (Kachin Defence Army), with over 20,000 strong forces, to reject the constitution. On March 22, KIO Central Committee issued an internal instruction, ordering its members not to vote in the upcoming referendum[7].


We had a good start in 1947 when our matured leaders signed the Panglong Agreement to build a unified and democratic country of Burma. However, the 1947 constitution did not satisfy the needs of ethnic populations and made some ethnic groups hold arms. The 1947 constitution was suspended in 1962 when the military took over power, and a new constitution was adopted by General Ne Win’s regime in 1974. The 1974 Constitution denied democracy, human rights and rights of all ethnic nationalities and therefore ethnic armed resistance have continued and intensified. Now, the military junta is planning to perpetuate the military dictatorship with another sham constitution. The military junta’s plan to hold the constitutional referendum in May 2008 and a multi-party general elections in 2010, without having serious political dialogue with Daw Aung San Su Kyi, NLD and ethnic representatives, is not the significant step forward, as welcomed and promoted by the UN Special Envoy Mr. Gambari. This is the beginning of the worst nightmare, another round of brutal confrontation and an opening of Pandora’s Box.


Now, let me stop the general overview here.




Aung Din

Executive Director

U.S. Campaign for Burma

aungdin@uscampaignforburma.org





[1] Conclusion reached in the conversations between His Majesty’s Government and the Delegation from the Executive Council of the Governor of Burma, dated 27th January 1947

[2] The Panglong Agreement, 1947

[3] Unofficial translation of the Bo Aung Kyaw Street Joint Statement No (1), dated August 29, 1990, by the National League for Democracy and United Nationalities League for Democracy

[4] Ditto

[5] Report of Secretary-General to UN Security Council on Children and Armed Conflict in Myanmar, S/2007/666, 16 November 2007

[6] Statement on constitutional referendum that will conduct in May by the Burmese military regime, New Mon State Party, March 9, 2008, http://www.nmsp.info/

[7] BBC Burmese Service Broadcast, March 22, 2008, Evening Program

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Brief Analysis of the Burmese Military Junta's Constitution

Brief Analysis of the Burmese Military Junta’s Constitution

Aung Din
Executive Director

U.S. Campaign for Burma
aungdin@uscampaignforburma.org
===========================================================================

(A) Powers Authorized to the Commander-in-Chief to Independently Administer the Military Affairs

(1) The Commander-in-Chief (CC) will become the most powerful person of the Country and will have the right to administer the military’s affairs independently. All military affairs, including recruitment and expansion of troops, promotion, troop positioning, budget, purchase and manufacturing of weapons, military-owned businesses, etc, will be administered by the CC according to this constitution (Article 20-B, 20-C, 20-F). The military, which is supposed to be a state organization, is not under the supervision of the President. The Parliament is restricted not to legislate and oversee the military (Article 115-B). All military personals who are accused of crimes, will be tried by the court-martial appointed by the CC (Article 343), state judiciary power has no jurisdiction over the military. Therefore, the military is allowed to stand above all three sovereign powers. Furthermore, according to the constitution, the CC and the military are granted power to monitor and intervene in all three sovereign powers.

(2) If there is an emergency situation, the CC is authorized to declare a state of emergency for the whole or parts of the country. The CC is then authorized to control all three branches of powers (executive, judiciary and legislative) as long as the country is in a state of emergency. In truth, the ‘state of emergency’ is a tool to fend off any attempt for amending the constitution. Thus, if there were to be an attempt to amend the constitution, the CC would simply declare a ‘state of emergency’; seize control of all three branches of state powers (Article 40-C, 413-B, 418-A, 419). This is authorizing the CC and the military to stage a coup at anytime they want.

(B) Powers Authorized to the Commander-in-Chief to Intervene in the Country’s Legislative Affairs

(3) According to this constitution, there will be two Chambers of Parliament at the central level, called "Peoples' Parliament" (PP) and "National Parliament" (NP) respectively. The Union Parliament (UP) is formed by the combination of the PP and the NP. The PP will have 440 Representatives, in which 330 will be elected from the various Townships according to their populations while 110 will be appointed by the CC (Article 109-B). Therefore, military officers, appointed by the CC, will control one quarter of the PP. The NP will have 224 Representatives, in which 168 will be elected from States and Regions (12 each from 7 states and 7 regions) and 56 will be appointed by the CC (Article 141-B). Therefore, the CC will control a quarter of the NP with its military officials.

(4) If civil servants are elected in the elections, they are required to retire from their occupations and abandoned the facilities, provided by the state. However, military officials, who are appointed by the CC to sit in the Parliament, are not required to do so. They still can keep their military positions and state facilities, houses and cars.

(5) The Union Parliament is supposed to be the highest body in the country's legislative affairs. However, according to this constitution, the Parliament has no right to legislate and/or oversee military affairs. The CC-appointed military officers in the Parliament are authorized to discuss the military affairs and budget separately and the Parliament is to approve their submission (Article 115-B, 147-B). Therefore, the Parliament will become a rubber stamp to endorse the CC's proposal.

© Powers Authorized to the Commander-in-Chief to Intervene in the Country’s Executive Affairs

(6) According to the election method, one of the three Presidential nominees will be a current military officer or a former military officer, nominated by the military representatives in the Parliament (Article 60-B/3). According to the stated criteria, Presidential nominee needs to be well acquainted with military affair (Article 59-D) and therefore two other nominees nominated by two other groups are also expected to be former military officers. As military officials appointed by the CC occupy one quarter of the Union Parliament, which will become the presidential Electoral College, no nominee can be elected without the support of military officials. Therefore, only the nominee who is favor by the military officials will become the President.

(7) Even so, the President has no right to exercise his executive power over the Commander-in-Chief and the military. Reversely, the CC has the authority to influence over the President. When the President establishes his Cabinet, he will not have power to appoint the ministers and deputy ministers for defense, home and border area affairs. The CC will recommend military officials to run these departments as ministers and deputy ministers and the President is required to appoint the CC's nominees (Article 232-B/2, B/3, C and 234-B, C). It is clear that by controlling the three most important Ministries (Defense, Home and Border Area Affairs) in the Cabinet, the Commander-in-Chief will be more powerful than the President.

(D) Powers Authorized to the Commander-in-Chief to Intervene in the Country’s Judiciary Affairs

(8) According to this constitution, the Commander-in-Chief will have the authority to administer the military affairs freely, including judiciary. Military personal, who involves in any crime, will be tried by court martial, appointed by the CC (Article 293-B, 319, 343). The civilian courts have no authority to try the military personals.
In that way, the military is above the law.

(9) According to this constitution, the President has the authority to appoint the Chief Justice and States/Regions Judges. Furthermore, the judiciary system has no jurisdiction over the military. As the President himself is less powerful than the Commander in-Chief, the CC will be able to intervene in judicial power freely.

(E) Powers Authorized to the Commander-in-Chief to Intervene in the Country’s Ethnic Nationalities Affairs

(10) All States and Regions will each have a State/Region Parliament, and military officials appointed by the Commander-in-Chief will occupy one quarter of all Parliaments (Article 161-D). The expectation of ethnic nationalities to obtain the right of self-determination will never be realized as unelected military officials will effectively intervene in their State affairs. According to this constitution, State Representatives will not have the chance to elect their Chief Minister, who will be the head of the State. The President will select one of the State Representatives to be the Chief Minister of the state (Article 261-B, C) and the State Chief Minister will be responsible to the President (Article 262-L/1/2). Ethnic nationalities do not even have a chance to elect their head of State by themselves. They have to accept someone chosen by the President.

(11) Then, the State Chief Minister has no right to form his or her Cabinet as he or she wishes. He or she has to compile a list of individuals to fill in the State Cabinet and submit it to the President (Article 262-E). Two of the State Cabinet members, who will run the security and border area affairs, will be appointed by the CC (Article 262-A/2). States do not have the right to appoint State Judges too. The President will appoint the State Judges, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the Union. Therefore, the judiciary power in States will be handled by the judges appointed by the President. As mentioned above, military officials occupy a quarter of State Parliaments and will intervene in State legislative affairs, as instructed by the Commander-in-Chief. Military officials also take charge of State security and border affairs and will effectively intervene in the State Executive power. Then Judges appointed by the President will handle the State judiciary affairs. There is no realistic possibility that equality among all ethnic nationalities and self-determination are met.

(12) Self-Administered Division and Zones will be led by the Leading Bodies and as usual, one quarter of the Bodies will be military officials appointed by the CC (Article 276-D/2, 276-H). The President will appoint the Chairman of the Leading Bodies (Article 276-F), while Judges appointed by the President will handle the Self-Administered Division and Zones judiciary affairs. Contrary to its name, there is no real self-administration.

(F) National Defense and Security Council

(13) According to this constitution, National Defense and Security Council (NDSC) will be formed with 11 persons (Article 201). The NDSC will have responsibilities to declare the state of emergency and appoint the Commander-in-Chief, who is the most powerful person in the country (Article 342).

Members of the NDCS are as follows:
(i) President, (ii) Vice-President, (iii) Vice-President, (iv) Head of Peoples' Parliament, (v) Head of National Parliament, (vi) Commander-in-Chief, (vii) Deputy Commander-in-Chief, (viii) Minister for Defense, (ix) Minister for Home Affairs, (x) Minister for Foreign Affairs and (xi) Minister for Border Area Affairs

(14) According to this formation, the Commander-in-Chief secures at least eight-vote majority at his side. They are;
(i) President, who can be elected only with the support of the military representatives in the Parliament
(ii) Vice-President, who will be nominated by military representatives in the Parliament
(iii) Commander-in-Chief himself
(iv) Deputy- Commander-in-Chief, who is appointed by the CC
(v) Minister for Defense, appointee of the Commander-in-Chief
(vi) Minister for Home Affairs, appointee of the Commander-in-Chief
(vii) Minister for Border Area Affairs, appointee of the Commander-in-Chief
(viii) Minister for Foreign Affairs, appointee of the President
With this super majority vote, the NDCS will be also a rubber stamp to advance the agenda of the Commander-in-Chief.

(G) Amendment is Impossible

(15) The junta makes it difficult to amend the constitution in the future. Any amendment will be submitted to the Union Parliament (the combination of Peoples' Parliament and National Parliament) with a sponsorship of at least 20% of the Parliament Representatives (Article 435). To amend the main Chapters of the constitution, including State Fundamental Principles, Formation of the State, Formation of Legislative Power, Formation of Administrative Power, Formation of Judiciary Power, State of Emergency, in addition to over 75% of the support of the Parliament, 100% of support from the national referendum is required (Article 436-A). Other chapters can be amended with over 75% of the support of the Parliament.

(16) Since military officials occupy 25% seats in the Parliament and they will vote as instructed by the Commander-in-Chief, to receive over 75% support is almost impossible. Even there are over 75% supports with all the 75% of elected representatives agree to amend the constitution and joining some military officials who might disobey the order of the Commander-in-Chief, obtaining 100% of the voters in the referendum is totally impossible. Even this happens, the CC will immediately declare the state of emergency with the reason to protect the constitution, and stage a coup officially, as the constitution has granted.

(H) However, Approval Is Much Easier

(17) The junta has also created a climate of fear for those who dare to oppose their plan. Decree 5/96, the law that punishes anyone who tries to disturb the constitution writing process with 20-years imprisonment, is still active. A new referendum law also imposes three-year imprisonment for those who criticize the constitution. Arrest and attack of the democracy activists by the junta security forces and its militias continues daily.

(18)The draft constitution, Chapter (XIV), Article 441 states "This Constitution shall come into force throughout the Union after its adoption in a referendum by the majority votes of more than half of all the people who have the right to vote." From this twist, the constitution is to be approved by the majority of more than 50% of the eligible voters. That means the junta needs only little more than 7 million votes to approve its constitution, as estimated numbers of eligible voters in Burma today are about 28 millions.

(19) To ensure that it wins, the junta also makes a provision of eligible voters in the referendum law. According to the referendum law, Chapter (V) Preparing Voting Rolls, Section 11 (a), the junta allows associate citizens and temporary certificate holders to vote in the referendum. No country allows associate citizens and temporary certificate holders (equivalent to the US permanent residents and legal residents with temporary visa) to participate in the referendum and the elections. There are more than two million Chinese in Burma who migrated from Yunnan Province in China since 1988. As favored by the junta, these Chinese immigrants are doing business very well and holding full and associate Burmese citizen cards, and they will surely vote for the constitution. Combination with military personals and families, as well as some USDA members, the junta can easily organize more then 50% of the voters to go to the polling stations and get enough votes to approve the constitution.

(I) Democracy Activists Are Not Allowed to Contest in the Elections

(20) Some expect that if all democracy activists unite and compete in the elections, they may capture all elected seats, which is 75% of the Parliament. Then, they may have chance to save the country, by working through the Parliament. However, we need to notice that there are restrictions in the constitution that limit the participation of many democracy activists in the elections. According to this constitution (Article 121-A, B, C), those who were/are in prison and convicted by courts for crimes are not allowed to contest in the elections. Almost all of NLD leaders, members and MPs, as well as student leaders, human rights defenders and democracy activists are in and out of prisons many times and some are still in prison, serving longer jail terms. They are surely not allowed to participate in the elections.

(21) Also, individuals, who were judged by an authoritative body as he or she is not eligible to contest in the elections, are also not allowed participating in the upcoming elections (Article 121-L). The elections commission, formed in 1989 by the military junta, made decision in 1990 that ban Daw Aung San Suu Kyi from competing in the 1990 elections. Therefore, as this ruling continues, she will not be eligible to contest. This constitution also bars those, who are loyal to the foreign governments and receive fund from them, since the military junta has accused all democracy forces as foreign stooges and axe-handles (Article 59-E). Those whose spouse and children are foreigners are also barred from contesting elections (Article 59-F). This provision effectively bars Daw Aung San Su Kyi, whose late husband was and their two sons are British citizens.

(J) Role of the Junta’s Militia “Union Solidarity and Development Association (USDA)”

(22) The military junta has formed the USDA as a civic organization. Gradually, USDA became the political arm of the military junta and a mechanism to monitor and oppress the people of Burma, on behalf of the junta. USDA is now involved in many activities, from midnight check and inspections in neighborhoods, road blocks and check points to watching activities of democracy activists and NLD members. With strong backing of the junta, USDA today is more arrogant and engaging in violent acts to crackdown on the peaceful protests. USDA members help police and military intelligence to arrest democracy activists and sometimes, even without law enforcement official, USDA members attack and detain democracy activists in many places. During the peaceful protests in August in September 2007, led by Buddhist Monks and student activists, the junta deployed thousands of USDA members, along with thousands of its security forces, to brutally attack Monks and peaceful demonstrators. The USDA is now given the assignment to run the referendum by the junta. We are confident that USDA members will employ all inappropriate and undemocratic methods, such as intimidation, vote buying, cheating and other frauds to endorse this sham constitution.

(23) After the referendum, USDA will become a political party and enter the elections. By using bullying methods and threat, it will surely try to get more seats in the Parliament and try to block democracy activists and honorable citizens from contesting in the elections. We are expecting to see a significant number of USDA representatives in the Parliament, who will stand together with military officials in the Parliament... It is clear that there will be no opportunities to amend the constitution in the future and it will also be impossible to promote democracy, human rights and equality among all ethnic nationalities, within the framework of this constitution.